Rule Extraction from Support Vector Machines: An Overview of Issues and Application in Credit Scoring
By David Martens, Johan Huysmans, Rudy Setiono, Jan Vanthienen, Bart Baesens. 2008
99 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Nadia Burkart
- Andrew P. Bradley
- Marco F. Huber
- Ljiljana Kašćelan
- Nahla H. Barakat
- Vladimir Kašćelan
- Miomir Jovanovic
In Artificial Intelligence
- Nadia Burkart
- Marco F. Huber
- Ljiljana Kašćelan
- Vladimir Kašćelan
- Miomir Jovanovic
- Nahla H. Barakat
- Andrew P. Bradley
- Isabelle Augenstein
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Nadia Burkart
- Marco F. Huber
- Andrew P. Bradley
- Nahla H. Barakat
- M. Islam
- Jakob Grue Simonsen
- Christina Lioma
- Or Biran
Citations in the corpus
- A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classification (2020, methodology): “Such post-hoc explanation techniques can be applicable to one specific model (Martens et al., 2008; Wagner et al., 2019) or to a broader range thereof (Ribeiro et al., 2016; Lundberg and Lee, 2017).”
- Interpretability of machine learning‐based prediction models in healthcare (2020, methodology): “Traditionally the focus in ML research was on global interpretability in an effort to help users understand the relationship between all possible inputs to a ML model and the space of all predictions made by the model (Bratko, 1999; Martens, et al., 2008).”
- Hybrid support vector machine rule extraction method for discovering the preferences of stock market investors: Evidence from Montenegro (2015, methodology): “The application of rule induction techniques to clean datasets leads to higher accuracy (Martens et al., 2008).”
- Rule extraction from support vector machines: A review (2010, methodology): “The survey conceptually groups and analyzes the literature at a higher level of abstraction, which outlines differing fundamental approaches to the topic, rather than summarizing the main features of individual algorithms, as in [37,49].”
- Explanation and Justification in Machine Learning : A Survey Or (2017, methodology): “[Martens et al., 2008] proposed to interpret the predictions of an SVM classifier by extracting conjunctive rules using a small subset of features.”
- ForEx++: A New Framework for Knowledge Discovery from Decision Forests (2017, methodology): “Extraction of rules from different types of classifiers is a popular area of research; in recent years a number of rule extraction methods have been proposed (Mashayekhi and Gras (2015), Martens et al. (2008), Schmitz et al. (1999)).”
- A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learning (2020, methodology): “Minerva (Martens et al., 2008) is a sequential covering algorithm that uses iterative growing to extract decision rules from a black box.”