Constraints on Earth-mass primordial black holes from OGLE 5-year microlensing events

By Hiroko Niikura, M. Takada, Shuichiro Yokoyama, T. Sumi, Shogo Masaki. Physical Review D, 2019

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We constrain the abundance of primordial black holes (PBH) using 2622 microlensing events obtained from 5-years observations of stars in the Galactic bulge by the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE). The majority of microlensing events display a single or at least continuous population that has a peak around the light curve timescale $t_{\rm E}\simeq 20~{\rm days}$ and a wide distribution over the range $t_{\rm E}\simeq [1, 300]~{\rm days}$, while the data also indicates a second population of 6 ultrashort-timescale events in $t_{\rm E}\simeq [0.1,0.3]~{\rm days}$, which are advocated to be due to free-floating planets. We confirm that the main population of OGLE events can be well modeled by microlensing due to brown dwarfs, main sequence stars and stellar remnants (white dwarfs and neutron stars) in the standard Galactic bulge and disk models for their spatial and velocity distributions. Using the dark matter (DM) model for the Milky Way (MW) halo relative to the Galactic bulge/disk models, we obtain the tightest upper bound on the PBH abundance in the mass range $M_{\rm PBH}\simeq[10^{-6},10^{-3}]M_\odot$ (Earth-Jupiter mass range), if we employ null hypothesis that the OGLE data does not contain any PBH microlensing event. More interestingly, we also show that Earth-mass PBHs can well reproduce the 6 ultrashort-timescale events, without the need of free-floating planets, if the mass fraction of PBH to DM is at a per cent level, which is consistent with other constraints such as the microlensing search for Andromeda galaxy (M31) and the longer timescale OGLE events. Our result gives a hint of PBH existence, and can be confirmed or falsified by microlensing search for stars in M31, because M31 is towards the MW halo direction and should therefore contain a much less number of free-floating planets, even if exist, than the direction to the MW center.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac73790992bb05739ab6d2301711fc93b96f3660

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Florian Kuhnel
  2. B. Carr
  3. A. Riotto
  4. Misao Sasaki
  5. G. Franciolini
  6. Guillem Domènech
  7. V. D. Luca
  8. R. Cai

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Marco Peloso
  2. M. Raidal
  3. F. Quevedo
  4. Michael E. Tobar
  5. Maxim Goryachev
  6. C. Hirata
  7. Florian Kuhnel
  8. M. Hindmarsh

Citations in the corpus