D-Nominate after 10 Years: A Comparative Update ToCongress: A Political Economic History of Roll Call Voting

By K. Poole, Howard Rosenthal. 2001

305 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac6a5956f8ff5af18e40657b24adf5ea3b00c804

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Alok Kumar
2. Thomas Bräuninger

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Filippo Menczer
2. Alessandro Flammini
3. Bruno Gonçalves
4. Alok Kumar
5. Jacob Ratkiewicz
6. Michael D. Conover
7. Thomas Bräuninger
8. Emilio Ferrara

In Strategy and Management

1. Alok Kumar
2. Jawad M. Addoum
3. Thomas Bräuninger

Citations in the corpus

• Predicting the Political Alignment of Twitter Users (2011, methodology): “The seminal work of Poole and Rosenthal applied multidimensional scaling to congressional voting records to quantify the ideological leanings of members of the first 99 United States Congresses [20].”
• Political Sentiment and Predictable Returns (2016, background): “This evidence of predictability is stronger in the recent time period, perhaps because political parties have become more polarized (e.g., Poole and Rosenthal (1997), Poole and Rosenthal (2001)).”
• A partisan model of government expenditure (2005, methodology): “…number of (quasi-)sentences as a measure for λi, the “efficiency weight” of party i but admit that this is only a rough measure for the variable in 11 Another technique is the revelation of preferences from observed voting behavior as employed in roll call vote analyses (Poole and Rosenthal 2001).”