Keeping a positive carbon balance under adverse conditions: responses of photosynthesis and respiration to water stress
By Jaume Flexas, Josefina Bota, J. Galmés, H. Medrano, M. Ribas-Carbó. 2006
804 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac67156ca39092bef6fc47a9d34ec7689bfcf288
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- The Impact of Drought in Plant Metabolism: How to Exploit Tolerance Mechanisms to Increase Crop Production (2020, background): “Water deficit conditions alter several activities of plant, but one of the main effects is the decline of photosynthetic activity [29,30] and finally the plant yield [31,32].”
- Drought tolerance and antioxidant enzymatic activity in transgenic ‘Swingle’ citrumelo plants over-accumulating proline (2011, background): “The main factor that leads to decrease of photosynthesis during water deficit is the reduced atmospheric CO2 availability caused by diffusion limitations through stomata and mesophyll (Flexas et al., 2006).”
- Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants: Unraveling the Complexity of Genes and Networks to Survive (2013, background): “However, at the whole-plant level, the contribution of respiration to the plant bioenergetics status is relevant because respiration can account for a release of 30-70% of the C fixed daily in well-watered plants, whereas in drought plants the proportion of C lost increases, mainly due to the decrea”
- Comparison of the effects of salt-stress and alkali-stress on photosynthesis and energy storage of an alkali-resistant halophyte Chloris virgata (2008, background): “The photosynthetic productivity of plants under stress provides the energy and materials not only for their normal growth and development, but also for their adapting to stress (Flexas et al. 2006).”
- Leaf gas exchange and water potential responses to drought in nine poplar (Populus spp.) clones with contrasting drought tolerance (2009, background): “Stomatal limitation of A is accepted as one of the main limitations to plant productivity in dry-land ecosystems (Grassi and Magnani 2005; Flexas et al. 2006; Diaz-Espejo et al. 2007).”
- Drought stress response in Jatropha curcas: Growth and physiology (2013, background): “After a moderate stress it can be fast and complete, but after severe stress recovery of photosynthesis can last from days to weeks and sometimes is never complete (Boyer, 1971; Miyashita et al., 2005; Flexas et al., 2006; Chaves et al., 2009, 2011).”
- Response of plants to water stress (2014, background): “Water stress directly affects rates of photosynthesis due to the decreased CO2 availability resulted from stomatal closure (Flexas et al., 2006; Chaves et al., 2009), and/or from changes in photosynthetic metabolism (Lawlor, 2002).”
- Discrimination between abiotic and biotic drought stress in tomatoes using hyperspectral imaging (2018, background): “Stomatal conductance rate and transpiration are directly connected to photosynthesis [53,54] and lower levels suggest stomata closing and hence lower rates of CO2 assimilation.”
- Mesophyll conductance to CO2: current knowledge and future prospects. (2008, methodology): “However, such anatomical and physiological differences were not induced when the expression of native NtAQP1 was blocked or over-expressed in tobacco, while still important differences in gm were associated with aquaporin levels (Flexas et al. 2006b).”
- Drought-induced changes in development and function of grapevine (Vitis spp.) organs and in their hydraulic and non-hydraulic interactions at the whole-plant level: a physiological and molecular update (2010, background): “Recovery of photosynthesis after water stress The carbon balance of a plant during a period of water stress and recovery may depend as much on the velocity and degree of photosynthetic recovery as on the degree and velocity of photosynthesis decline during water depletion (Flexas et al. 2006).”