Cognition in emotion: Always, sometimes, or never

By Gerald L. Clore, Andrew Ortony. 2000

290 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac6598249f41309db6a40000479165dd36aab895

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review (2012, unknown): “University of Geneva, on 20 Oct 2017 at 14:48:49, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. to psychological construction accounts (e.g., Clore & Ortony 2000; 2008) (cf. Gross & Barrett 2011).”
Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. (2005, unknown): “represent physical features of the world, and there are no sensory receptors for emotional value [37].”
The Embodiment of Emotion (2008, background): “Information about the relational context (Lazarus, 1991) or a situation’s meaning to a person at a particular point in time (Clore & Ortony, 2000) may constitute some of the background information contained in situated conceptualizations of an emotion category that, like objects, may serve to…”
Theories of emotion causation: A review (2009, background): “They put forward two (sometimes three) mechanisms for emotion elicitation: one is rule based, the other is associative (e.g., Clore & Ortony, 2000; Smith & Kirby, 2000, 2001; Teasdale, 1999; van Reekum & Scherer, 1997; see Smith & Neumann, 2005, for a review).”
Solving the Emotion Paradox: Categorization and the Experience of Emotion (2006, methodology): “The conceptual act model of emotion is probably closest to the ideas presented in Clore & Ortony (2000), where a situation’s meaning can be either reinstated or computed anew during each instance of conceptualization.”
Determinants and Measurement of Climate Change Risk Perception, Worry, and Concern (2017, background): “The primacy of “affect” as an independent force in shaping (risk) judgments has been debated at length in psychology (Clore & Ortony, 2000; Lazarus, 1984; Loewenstein et al., 2001; Zajonc, 1984), and although the human brain is fast and experienced in mapping environmental cues directly into…”
From affect to control: Functional specialization of the insula in motivation and regulation (2017, background): “Objects and situations rarely have intrinsic value or meaning; rather, value is acquired through cognitive appraisal of their significance and assessment of their impact on well-being (Clore, 2000; R. S. Lazarus, 1991a, 1991b).”
Automatic Constructive Appraisal as a Candidate Cause of Emotion (2010, unknown): “Thus, under suboptimal conditions, the flexibility that comes with constructive processing in the rule-based mode is lost (cf. Clore & Ortony, 2000; Smith & Kirby, 2001).”
Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms (2009, background): “human psychologists as being multifaceted and comprising other ‘components’ in addition to subjective experience, namely behavioural and physiological changes (e.g. Plutchik, 1980; Ekman, 1984; Scherer, 1984; Frijda, 1988; Smith and Lazarus, 1993; Clore and Ortony, 2000; Lerner and Keltner, 2000).”
The Emotional Citizen: Emotion as a Function of Political Sophistication (2011, background): “…ignore the arousal dimension because of disagreement over its interpretation, though most who do address it interpret it as intensity of feeling (Clore and Ortony 2000). that vary in intensity (Cacioppo and Berntson 1994, 1999; Cacioppo, Gardner, and Berntson 1997, 1999; Watson et al. 1999).”
To feel or not to feel: The role of affect in human-computer interaction (2003, background): “Most researchers would agree that emotion effects fall into four categories: somatic–physiological; cognitive–interpretive; motivational–behavioral and experiential–subjective (Clore and Ortony, 2002).”
Emotional Balancing of Organizational Continuity and Radical Change: The Contribution of Middle Managers (2002, background): “Cognition and emotion are closely intertwined inasmuch as cognitive appraisals are often necessary to arouse emotion (Clore and Ortony, 2000).”
The experience of emotion. (2007, background): “Appraisals, when they are treated as descriptions (rather than causes) of situated meaning (e.g., Clore & Ortony 2000, Frijda 2006, Smith & Ellsworth 1985), provide the best available evidence for mapping the experience of a situation that occurs in a mental representation of emotion.”
The Use of Judgement Bias to Assess Welfare in Farm Livestock (2015, background): “Human psychology considers that emotional states have a multifaceted nature (Clore & Ortony 2000; Lerner & Keltner 2000).”