Direct seeding of mass-cultured coral larvae is not an effective option for reef rehabilitation
By Alasdair Edwards, James R. Guest, Andrew Heyward, R. Villanueva, M. V. Baria, I. S. F. Bollozos, Yimnang Golbuu. 2015
82 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac54f70b27187ae0d7b624beaaede54af13c9030
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Global and Planetary Change
- A. Negri
- Andrew Heyward
- M. Omori
- P. Harrison
- Carly J. Randall
- N. Webster
- R. Babcock
- Trevor J. Willis
Citations in the corpus
- Eco-engineering urban infrastructure for marine and coastal biodiversity: Which interventions have the greatest ecological benefit? (2018, unknown): “Edwards et al. 2015 4.”
- Coral restoration research and technical developments: what we have learned so far (2019, background): “Monitoring after 30 weeks and ∼13months showed, however, no significant differences in the recruit densities between seeded treatments and control (Edwards et al. 2015).”
- Sexual production of corals for reef restoration in the Anthropocene (2020, background): “Nonetheless, increased settlement rates on artificial surfaces did not elevate the numbers of surviving 1 yr old corals above that observed in adjacent areas with natural recruitment in Palau (Edwards et al. 2015).”