The Role of Dehumanization in Attitudes Toward the Social Exclusion and Rehabilitation of Sex Offenders

By G. Viki, Iona Fullerton, H. Raggett, Fiona Tait, S. Wiltshire. 2012

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac4de0eb18b0fcc9bce70c587f47e8cd2c58e622

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. S. Loughnan
2. Nick Haslam

In Gender Studies

1. S. Loughnan
2. Nick Haslam
3. Sarah L. Desmarais

In Sociology and Political Science

1. S. Loughnan
2. Nick Haslam
3. Sarah L. Desmarais
4. Mina Cikara
5. Brock Bastian
6. Yoshihisa Kashima
7. Adam Waytz
8. Jeroen Vaes

Citations in the corpus

• A Meta-Analysis of Public Attitudes Toward Ex-Offenders (2016, background): “…interpersonal contact theory, members of the public who report having contact with ex-offenders (Gibson, Roberson, & Daniel, 2009; Hirschfield & Piquero, 2010; but see Dreiling, 2011), even sex offenders (Viki et al., 2012; Willis, Levenson, & Ward, 2010), generally report more favorable attitudes.”
• Dehumanization and infrahumanization. (2014, background): “Similarly, Viki et al. (2012) found that participants who dehumanized sex offenders were more likely to support excluding them from society.”