A Self Instructing Course in Mode Choice Modeling: Multinomial and Nested Logit Models
By Frank S. Koppelman, Chandra R. Bhat. 2006
495 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac45ea6feed53705e7a6fcc1d16c5ab84d1b688e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Naveen Eluru
- Ipek N. Sener
- Chandra R. Bhat
- Baojun Tang
- Biying Yu
- Xiao-Yi Li
- Yi-Ming Wei
- Sabreena Anowar
Citations in the corpus
- How app-based ride-hailing services influence travel behavior: An empirical study from China (2020, methodology): “Consequently, two discrete choice models—a multinomial logit (MNL) model and a binary logit model (Koppelman & Bhat, 2006)—are applied here to determine and quantify the effects of these factors on individuals’ travel mode choices behavior and car-purchasing behaviors, respectively.”
- Willingness to Pay for Energy Conservation and Free-Ridership on Subsidization: Evidence from Germany (2009, unknown): “As discussed by Koppelman and Bhat (2006), this more flexible approach captures both heterogeneous preferences and complex correlation patterns by layering the error components on top of the random-parameter logit model.”
- An analysis of bicycle route choice preferences in Texas, US (2009, background): “Thus, an advantage of using a disaggregate-level analysis framework is that it better captures the fundamental behavioral relationship between bicyclist route preferences and its determinants (see Koppelman and Bhat, 2006 for an extensive discussion).”