Analysis of diameter-density relationships and self-thinning in non-thinned even-aged Scots pine stands

By M. Río, G. Montero, Felipe Bravo. 2001

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac0e2ecc538a0e1c16682ed0348c8725340fdacf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

1. Hans Pretzsch
2. S. Condés
3. M. Río
4. Hubert Sterba
5. S. Vospernik

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Hans Pretzsch
2. S. Condés
3. M. Río

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Hans Pretzsch
2. S. Condés
3. M. Río
4. Hubert Sterba
5. S. Vospernik
6. D. Forrester
7. Peter Biber
8. Eric K. Zenner

Citations in the corpus

• Analyzing size-symmetric vs. size-asymmetric and intra- vs. inter-specific competition in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) mixed stands (2014, methodology): “(1)) have previously been determined for the studied species in pure stands (Rio et al., 2001; Pretzsch and Biber, 2005), we used the generic figure proposed by Reineke E = -1.”
• Do competition-density rule and self-thinning rule agree? (2014, result): “This agrees well with many other studies which find steeper slopes, which are at least for some species significantly different from Reineke’s coefficient (Sterba 1987; Del Rio et al. 2001; Pretzsch and Biber 2005).”