Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.

By R. Ferrer, A. Artigas, Mitchell M. Levy, J. Blanco, G. González-Díaz, J. Garnacho-Montero, J. Ibáñez, E. Palencia, M. Quintana, M. V. de la Torre-Prados. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2008

731 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Epidemiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac0c2ae0965be3ea7b7ba12b367f972d87667c7c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

1. P. Marik
2. Mitchell M. Levy

In Epidemiology

1. Mitchell M. Levy
2. Margaret M. Parker
3. P. Marik

Citations in the corpus

• The demise of early goal‐directed therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock (2015, background): “This suggests that factors other than EGDT were responsible for improved outcome.(24) Shiramizo et al.”
• The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis (2010, positive): “These results are consistent with an earlier report from Spain [38], and extend the findings of that study by suggesting that the improvement in achievement of bundle targets and association with improved outcome is sustained over time and is demonstrated across a wide number of countries and setting”