Spaces for the Assessment of Knowledge

By Jean-Paul Doignon, J. Falmagne. 1985

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Shane T. Mueller
2. Yin-Yin Tan
3. John Levi Martin
4. J. Wiley
5. Kejkaew Thanasuan
6. Mahzarin R. Banaji

Citations in the corpus

• Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AI (2019, neutral): “Letainger, 1984; Corbett and Anderson, 1991, 2001; Doignon and Falmagne, 1985; Fonseca and Chi, 2011; Forbus and Feltovich, 2001; Frederiksen, White, Collins, Allan, and Eggan, 1988; Guerlain, 1995; Haddawy, Jacobson, and Kahn, 1997; Katz and Lesgold, 1992; Kehoe, Stasko, and Taylor, 2001; Lajoie,…”
• 4. Algebraic Representations of Beliefs and Attitudes II: Microbelief Models for Dichotomous Belief Data (2000, background): “Doignon and Falmagne (1985) have made this argument and have considered some systems in which both “and” and “or” operations underlie the construction of complex knowledges.”
• Cognitive perspectives on opinion dynamics: the role of knowledge in consensus formation, opinion divergence, and group polarization (2017, background): “The knowledge space lattice [110, 112] describing these states can be formed through complement arithmetic [111, 113, 114], in order to identify which states are subsets or supersets of other states.”