Private Power and Global Authority: Index

By A. C. Cutler. 2003

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/abfeb502081e02f7835274cca603a91e0cf68e51

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. T. Risse
2. Anke Hassel
3. Tanja A. Börzel
4. Matthew D. Stephen

In Political Science and International Relations

1. T. Risse
2. Anke Hassel
3. Tanja A. Börzel
4. Matthew D. Stephen
5. D. Levi‐Faur
6. W. Jacoby
7. Rachel Epstein
8. Stefan Becker

In Strategy and Management

1. T. Risse
2. Anke Hassel
3. Tanja A. Börzel
4. Matthew D. Stephen
5. W. Jacoby
6. Rachel Epstein

Citations in the corpus

• Rising powers, global capitalism and liberal global governance: A historical materialist account of the BRICs challenge (2014, background): “…and standards, transnational networks and civil society organizations, transnational policy planning forums, and international law, through to international ‘regimes’ and the high tables of the United Nations organs (Cox, 1996: 301–303; Cutler, 2003; Gale, 1998; Gill, 1990; Levi-Faur, 2005).”
• The Evolution of a Global Labor Governance Regime (2008, background): “As literature on “non-state market-driven governance systems” (Cashore 2002) and international private authority (Cutler 2003; Cutler, Haufler, and Porter 1999; Hall and Biersteker 2002) argue, states are turning to “market-based” and private voluntary strategies as an alterna- TABLE 1…”
• Governance without a state: Can it work? (2010, background): “The counterargument posits that governance without government amounts to the privatization of state functions and to the overtaking of governance tasks by illegitimate actors such as companies (for a critical view, see e.g. Altvater & Mahnkopf 2002; Cutler 2003).”
• Multinationals as Global Institution: Power, Authority and Relative Autonomy (2018, unknown): “…immensely through the so-called new lex mercatoria or merchant law , which has the effect of “ delocalizing ” not only commercial transactions but also related lawmaking and enforceable dispute settlement (Cutler 2003; Sassen 2006; Callies & Zumbansen 2010; Ruggie & Sherman 2015; Robé 2016).”