A comparison among strategies for interpolating maximum and minimum daily air temperatures. Part II: The interaction between number of guiding variables and the type of interpolation method
By Claire H. Jarvis, Neil Stuart. 2001
200 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/abf65061dbae2ae1c507e816b61ad0ddedced48f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Global and Planetary Change
- F. Lima
- António Múrias dos Santos
- Malcolm R. Haylock
- Tomislav Hengl
- P. Ribeiro
- S. Hawkins
- N. Hofstra
- N. Queiroz
Citations in the corpus
- Recent changes in the distribution of a marine gastropod, Patella rustica Linnaeus, 1758, and their relationship to unusual climatic events (2006, methodology): “Each cell was derived from the 12 nearest data points using the distance squared weighting algorithm (Jarvis & Stuart, 2001).”
- A Practical Guide to Geostatistical Mapping (2009, background): “Regression-kriging of climatic variables, especially the ones derived from DEMs, is now favoured in many 2 climatologic applications (Jarvis and Stuart, 2001; Lloyd, 2005).”
- Comparison of six methods for the interpolation of daily, European climate data (2008, background): “Many studies have found that universal kriging is one of the best interpolation methods for both mean precipitation and temperature [e.g., Attorre et al., 2007], as well as daily climate variables [ Jarvis and Stuart, 2001; Stahl et al., 2006].”