Application of the analytic hierarchy process to tourism choice and decision making : a review and illustration applied to destination competitiveness.

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Destination competitiveness: what we know, what we know but shouldn't and what we don't know but should (2016, background): “Recognizing this shortcoming, several scholars have made attempts to identify the relative importance of indicators (Crouch, 2010; Crouch & Ritchie, 2005; Enright & Newton, 2004, 2005; Lee & King, 2006).”
The role of individual entrepreneurs in the development of competitiveness for a rural tourism destination – A case study (2014, background): “Relativity refers to relevant competing locations, which means that it is important to establish which destinations comprise the competitive set (Crouch & Ritchie, 2005; Enright & Newton, 2004; Uysal, Chen, & Williams, 2000).”
Conceptualization of Smart Tourism Destination Competitiveness (2016, background): “…was recognized academically and practically, some researchers elaborated on the original conceptual model of destination competitiveness (Crouch and Ritchie, 2005; Dwyer and Kim, 2003; Mazanec et al., 2007) and other researchers verified the model empirically (Crouch, 2010;…”
Identifying and Ranking the Determinants of Tourism Performance (2012, background): “Even studies on tourism competitiveness (Crouch and Ritchie 1999, 2005; Assaf, Barros, and Josiassen, forthcoming) emphasize that ranking destinations should be based not solely on their competitive advantage but also on their actual tourism performance.”