Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion

By J. Prinz. 2004

1,039 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/abe80748240274b773e92ee159c1fef2e6d80df7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Physiology

Citations in the corpus

Affective intentionality and the feeling body (2008, background): “That’s what he means when he says “emotions are like smoke alarms” (cf. Prinz 2004b, 82) – detecting significant objects and events is these feelings’ evolutionary function.”
An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood (2010, background): “We suggest that mood states provide information about the type of environment the organism is living in—the presence (or probability) of threats and reward opportunities—and how well it is coping (see also Carver 2001, 2003; Prinz 2004).”
From affect programs to dynamical discrete emotions (2009, methodology): “Ekman and Izard’s framework and methodology have inspired much of subsequent experimental developments, and their work has also informed philosophical accounts of emotion (e.g., de Sousa, 1987; DeLancey, 2002; Goldie, 2000; Griffiths, 1997; Prinz, 2004).”
Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment (2008, background): “Our findings are in line with recent approaches emphasizing that emotional processes are fundamentally embodied (e.g., Niedenthal et al., 2005; Prinz, 2004).”
Motivational Processing and Choice Behavior During Television Viewing: An Integrative Dynamic Approach (2011, background): “Emotion plays a central role in our experience (Prinz, 2004), including mediated experience.”
Mood measurement with Pick-A-Mood: review of current methods and design of a pictorial self-report scale (2016, positive): “For instance, an irritable mood can feel like a mild form of the emotion anger, cheerfulness like a mild joy, gloominess like a mild sadness, and nervousness like a mild fear (Prinz, 2004).”
Which Emotions Are Basic (2007, background): “I call this the embodied appraisal theory (Prinz, 2004).”
Theories of emotion causation: A review (2009, background): “Emotion theorists not only disagree about the components that they include in the emotional episode, but also about the component(s) that they include in or identify with the emotion (Prinz, 2004 ).”
The Feeling Body: Toward an Enactive Approach to Emotion (2007, background): “a linear way (see Prinz, 2004, pp. 74, 98 -100).”
An Appraisal-Driven Componential Approach to the Emotional Brain (2018, positive): “This perspective gave rise to neo-Jamesian theories of emotion (e.g., Damasio, 1998; Prinz, 2004).”
How to Do Things with Emotional Expressions: The Theory of Affective Pragmatics (2017, background): “This “teleosemantic” proposal needs significant development, faces various obstacles, and is just one of the many options on the table (Dretske, 1988; Prinz, 2004).”
Alief in Action (and Reaction) (2008, background): “For the distinction between registering and representing content, see Prinz, 2004 .”
The Hourglass of Emotions (2011, background): “Few tentative efforts to detect non-basic affective states, such as fatigue, anxiety, satisfaction, confusion, or frustration, have been also made [17–22] (Table.”
The nature of epistemic feelings (2014, background): “As noted at the outset, E-feelings, like other types of experiences, are embodied: they are directed to an internal condition of the subject’s body, in the sense of being caused by or attached to certain bodily reactions (Prinz, 2004).”