Latent Variable Models of Selectional Preference
By Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha. 2010
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics & Semantics
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
- Yoav Goldberg
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Christopher D. Manning
- Omer Levy
- Ivan Titov
- Mohit Bansal
- Percy Liang
- Yejin Choi
In Computational Linguistics & Semantics
- Ivan Titov
- Sam Clark
- Oren Etzioni
- Mirella Lapata
- Alan Ritter
- Diego Marcheggiani
- Yoav Goldberg
- Lea Frermann
Citations in the corpus
- Dependency-Based Word Embeddings (2014, methodology): “In some works, the dimensionality of the sparse word-context vectors is reduced, using techniques such as SVD (Bullinaria and Levy, 2007) or LDA (Ritter et al., 2010; Séaghdha, 2010; Cohen et al., 2012).”
- Open domain event extraction from twitter (2012, methodology): “We adopt an approach based on latent variable models inspired by recent work on modeling selectional preferences [47, 39, 22, 52, 48], and unsupervised information extraction [4, 55, 7].”
- A Bayesian Model of Diachronic Meaning Change (2016, background): “Bayesian models have been previously developed for various tasks in lexical semantics (Brody and La- pata, 2009; Ó Séaghdha, 2010; Ritter et al., 2010) and word meaning change detection is no exception.”
- Discrete-State Variational Autoencoders for Joint Discovery and Factorization of Relations (2016, methodology): “We consider both a factorization method inspired by previous research in knowledge base modeling (as discussed above) and another, even simpler one, based on ideas from previous research on modeling selectional preferences (e.g., Resnik (1997); Ó Séaghdha (2010); Van de Cruys (2010)), plus their…”