International R&D Spillovers and Institutions

By David T. Coe, E. Helpman, A. Hoffmaister. 2009

720 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/abd3409bac4deeef99ab9e7f0191050a14fad3be

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Neighbors and the evolution of the comparative advantage of nations: Evidence of international knowledge diffusion? (2014, positive): “When these goods are imported, they accelerate productivity growth in the recipient country (e.g. Rivera-Batiz and Romer, 1990; Coe and Helpman, 1995; Coe et al., 2009).”
Public R&D Policies and Private R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence (2015, positive): “In a crosscountry analysis, Czarnitzki and Lopes Bento (2012) conclude that private R&D in Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and Spain would benefit from an extension of public R&D subsidies to currently nonsubsidised firms.”
Institutions, human capital, and growth: The institutional mechanism (2012, positive): “For instance, Coe et al. (2009) find evidence that better institutions increase the returns to R&D investments, and also increase the benefit from international R&D spillover and human capital formation.2 Seck (2011) shows that countries with strong institutions experience a significant increase in…”
Migration, Knowledge Diffusion and the Comparative Advantage of Nations (2018, positive): “12 When it comes to trade, there is a vast literature which documents how strong trade links are drivers of knowledge diffusion (e.g., Coe et al. 2009).”
The Internationalization of R&D (2011, neutral): “(Coe et al. 1997, 2009).”
Environmental Innovations, Local Networks and Internationalization (2012, positive): “In the same respect, the embeddedness of foreign-owned firms in the local institutional set-up is also very relevant (e.g. van Beers et al., 2008; Coe et al., 2009).”
Innovation, Productivity, and Monetary Policy (2017, neutral): “We include the same countries as Coe et al. (2009), with just two exceptions due to data availability.22 Table F.1 contains a complete list of the countries and years included in our panel.”
Taxation, corruption, and growth (2016, neutral): “…emerge for further analysis.10 Finally, we have focused the empirical work in this paper on panel econometric approaches, whereas recent research finds important insights about related problems using applied-macro techniques like panel cointegration (Coe et al. 2009, Bronzini and Piselli 2009).”
Innovation across Europe: how important are institutional differences? (2011, neutral): “For instance, Djankov et al. (2002) and Desai et al. (2003) investigate the impact of institutions on entrepreneurial activity and firm dynamics, Alesina et al. (2005) on investment, Griffith et al. (2007) on unemployment, Coe et al. (2008) on productivity and international R&D spillovers.”
Global networks, local specialisation and regional patterns of innovation (2020, positive): “Indeed, while the impact of trade strongly depends on the technological content of the traded goods (Bloom et al., 2016; Coe and Helpmann, 1995; Coe et al., 2009; Keller, 2009), inward FDI may brought into the region new knowledge and technology which may positively stimulate local innovation capaci”