Office Size of Big 4 Auditors and Client Restatements
By Jere R. Francis, Paul N. Michas, Michael D. Yu. 2013
291 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/abc212c142f5871ff7f6f915860635db0cc23dd9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Jeffrey A. Pittman
- Donghui Wu
- Paul N. Michas
- Xiaohua Fang
- Oliver M. Rui
- Jeffrey L. Callen
- Xianjie He
- Jere R. Francis
In Strategy and Management
- Donghui Wu
- Jeffrey A. Pittman
- Jere R. Francis
- Oliver M. Rui
- Paul N. Michas
- Xiaohua Fang
- Siska Apriliana
- Jeffrey L. Callen
Citations in the corpus
- The Contagion Effect of Low-Quality Audits (2013, background): “Finally, a concurrent study by Francis et al. (2012) makes a limited comparison of income restatements in the Audit Analytics and Compustat Unrestated Quarterly databases and finds that both contain some errors, but when the two databases are in agreement, they correspond to SEC filings.”
- Do Social Ties between External Auditors and Audit Committee Members Affect Audit Quality (2016, methodology): “For example, Lennox and Pittman (2010) find that Big N clients are less likely to commit fraudulent financial reporting and Francis et al. (2013) document that larger Big N offices have fewer client restatements.”
- Does a Lack of Choice Lead to Lower Quality?: Evidence from Auditor Competition and Client Restatements (2013, unknown): “13 We follow prior literature and use restatements as a measure of audit quality (e.g., Kinney et al. 2004; Schmidt 2012; Francis et al. 2013; Schmidt and Wilkins 2013).”
- The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach (2017, background): “Francis et al.(2013) stated that the larger the size of the public accounting firm, the possibility of fraud would be lower because the large public accounting firm was considered to have a higher experience and expertise on the client industry.”
- Fee Pressure and Audit Quality (2014, unknown): “A high-quality audit should, ceteris paribus, be more likely to detect material misstatements at a higher rate than would a lower quality audit (Palmrose and Scholz, 2004; Francis et al., 2013).”
- Crash Risk and the Auditor-Client Relationship (2017, background): “Francis et al. (2013) raise another related limitation of accrual quality measures, namely, that they only measure the abnormal part of earnings relative to statistical norms and thus do not reflect the economic impact of aggressive accounting policies.”