Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern (FBCSP) in Brain-Computer Interface
By Kai Keng Ang, Z. Y. Chin, Haihong Zhang, Cuntai Guan. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, 2008
1,466 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab6a90f44f0fe280f6207981bb62beb88602281e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Fabien Lotte
- Cuntai Guan
- Benjamin Blankertz
- Christian Andreas Kothe
- Michael W. Tangermann
- K. Müller
- Kai Keng Ang
- Scott Makeig
Citations in the corpus
- Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern Algorithm on BCI Competition IV Datasets 2a and 2b (2012, methodology): “Given that ω , ω ∈ {1, 2, 3, 4} represents the left, right, foot, and tongue motor imagery, the Divide-and-Conquer (DC) approach adopts a tree-based classifier approach (Zhang et al., 2007; Chin et al.,2009).”
- EEG-Based Spatio–Temporal Convolutional Neural Network for Driver Fatigue Evaluation (2019, unknown): “The filter bank CSP method in [21] was extended to help improve the performance of signal decomposition.”
- Review of the BCI Competition IV (2012, methodology): “is based on the filter bank common spatial pattern (FBCSP) variant (Ang et al., 2008).”
- Learning Temporal Information for Brain-Computer Interface Using Convolutional Neural Networks (2018, methodology): “FBCSP was first introduced as an extension to the original Common Spatial Patterns (CSP) algorithm and gained attention by winning the 2008 BCI Competition IV-2a [16], [15].”
- EEG-TCNet: An Accurate Temporal Convolutional Network for Embedded Motor-Imagery Brain–Machine Interfaces (2020, methodology): “One of the first successful CNN in MI classification was Shallow ConvNet [9], which was inspired by FBCSP.”
- Subject-Independent Brain–Computer Interfaces Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (2019, methodology): “The top row depicts the subject-dependent approaches in the order of CSP, FBCSP, and BSSFO, and the bottom row displays the 6 and 7 show the performance changes by the number of subjects and the frequency bands.”
- EEG dataset and OpenBMI toolbox for three BCI paradigms: an investigation into BCI illiteracy (2019, unknown): “To date, a whole range of methods have been proposed that fulfill this task, such as heuristics [54], filter-banks [25,55], Bayesian methods [26], among many others.”
- Mental workload during n-back task—quantified in the prefrontal cortex using fNIRS (2014, methodology): “See Ang et al. (2008) for a more detailed description of feature selection methods using Mutual Information.”
- Optimizing the Channel Selection and Classification Accuracy in EEG-Based BCI (2011, methodology): “Comparing Tables III and IV also shows that on average, dataset IVa required more channels to achieve higher accuracy compared to dataset IIa.”
- Regularized Common Spatial Pattern With Aggregation for EEG Classification in Small-Sample Setting (2010, methodology): “In [35], EEG signals are decomposed into subbands, where CSP is applied to extract features from each subband, and then the subband scores are”
- HS-CNN: a CNN with hybrid convolution scale for EEG motor imagery classification (2020, background): “To address this issue, the authors of [35] proposed filter bank common spatial pattern (FBCSP), an improved version of CSP.”
- EEGLAB, SIFT, NFT, BCILAB, and ERICA: New Tools for Advanced EEG Processing (2011, methodology): “…Regularized and variational Bayesian logistic regression and sparse Bayesian logistic regression [39, 40] (vi) Baseline filtering (4) Multiband-CSP [41] (1) Hierarchical kernel learning [42] (vii) Resampling (5) Multi-Model Independent component features (viii) Relevance vector machines (RVM) [43]…”
- BCILAB: a platform for brain–computer interface development (2013, background): “While these CSP variants operate on a single frequency band (usually a ‘wideband’ 7-30 Hz window for motor imagery task data), the implemented variant of the Filter-Bank CSP approach (FBCSP) [57] instead solves one CSP instance per frequency band of interest and pools the resulting features.”
- Transfer Learning for EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces: A Review of Progress Made Since 2016 (2020, unknown): “For example, Schirrmeister et al. [65] proposed two convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for EEG decoding, and showed that both outperformed filter bank common spatial patterns (FBCSP) [66] in cross-subject MI classification.”
- An end-to-end deep learning approach to MI-EEG signal classification for BCIs (2018, background): “On the one hand, this suggests that low-pass filtering the signal before processing, as it is often done (refer to (Ang et al., 2008; Bentlemsan et al., 2014; Park et al., 2014a; Tabar & Halici, 2017)), may even discard relevant information and degrade the classification results.”
- A New Discriminative Common Spatial Pattern Method for Motor Imagery Brain–Computer Interfaces (2009, methodology): “The FBCSP in [6] algorithm extracts CSP features from a fixed FB consisting of nine Chebyshev type II bandpass filters and a feature selection process is done before classifying the signals.”
- Macroscopic EEG reveals discriminative low-frequency oscillations in plan-to-grasp visuomotor tasks (2025, unknown): “…Grasp vs no grasp scenarios: • Pen (60 trials) vs empty (60 trials) • Bottle (60 trials) vs empty (60 trials) For multiclass classification, CSP filters were extended to handle all three conditions simultaneously using the one-vs-rest strategy [37] given the binary constraint of the FBCSP method.”