Comparison of biomass productivity and nitrogen fixing potential of Azolla SPP
By A. Arora, Pramod Kumar Singh. 2003
87 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Study was conducted on six different Azolla species, available in the germplasm collection of NCCUBGA, IARI, New Delhi namely A. filiculoides, A. mexicana, A. microphylla, A. pinnata, A. rubra and A. caroliniana in a polyhouse to assess their growth potential by determining their maximal biomass productivity, doubling time and relative growth rates. Their nitrogen fixing potential was assessed by acetylene reduction assay. Among them Azolla microphylla gave highest biomass production and relative growth rate followed by Azolla caroliniana. Both these had high nitrogenase activity also. Peak nitrogenase activity of these strains was found on 14th day of growth and it declined on further incubation. Azolla microphylla and Azolla rubra were more tolerant to salinity than others. On the other hand Azolla pinnata, which is endemic species found in India, exhibited low biomass production, relative growth rate and lower nitrogenase activity compared to other species. It was unable to sustain growth in saline medium. Under polyhouse conditions, A. microphylla was found to perform better than other cultures in terms of biomass productivity, N fixing ability and salt tolerance. Hence it is taken up for mass production.
Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Insect Science, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab59f528495758e70e679a61e929bad2212d2d00
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- A review of some ecological factors affecting the growth of Azolla spp. (2013, background): “Until now, many publications have focused on the Azolla-Anabaena association and nitrogen fixation in Azolla (e.g. Van Hove and Lejeune, 2002; Arora and Singh, 2003; FernándezZamudio et al., 2010), while very little is known about its habitat needs particularly as an invasive species in a new…”