The no-choice option and dual response choice designs

By Jeff D. Brazell, Christopher G. Diener, Ekaterina V. Karniouchina, William L. Moore, V. Séverin, Pierre-Francois Uldry. 2006

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Valuation of environmental and societal trade-offs of renewable energy sources (2013, background): “…procedure ensures, in case of large number of opt-out choices, gathering information on relative attractiveness of renewable energy alternatives (see, Brazell et al., 2006) and forces the respondent to pay attention to attributes and levels when the opt-out option as an easy option is not present.”
How Should Consumers’ Willingness to Pay be Measured? An Empirical Comparison of State-of-the-Art Approaches (2011, methodology): “Therefore, future studies could extend our analysis to other approaches that measure WTP, such as dual response choice designs (see Brazell et al. 2006) and the upgrading method (Park, Ding, and Rao 2008).”
Modeling the choices of individual decision-makers by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference information (2008, background): “(1999) discuss various ways to collect responses from persons consistent with RUT, showing how various response modes can be used to obtain extra choice information that can be expanded into implied choices (see also, Brazell et al., 2006). For example, if there are J options in a particular choice ”