Blind detection of independent dynamic components
By Lars Kai Hansen, Jan Larsen, Thomas Kolenda. 2001
84 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Analytical Chemistry, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Analytical Chemistry
- Andrea d'Avella
- J. D. de Winter
- Ned S. Wingreen
- Shou-Wen Wang
- Anne-Florence Bitbol
- Peter A. Wieringa
- Dimitra Dodou
- Matthew C. Tresch
In Artificial Intelligence
- Andrea d'Avella
- J. D. de Winter
- Ned S. Wingreen
- Shou-Wen Wang
- Anne-Florence Bitbol
- Peter A. Wieringa
- Dimitra Dodou
- Matthew C. Tresch
In Signal Processing
- Andrea d'Avella
- J. D. de Winter
- Ned S. Wingreen
- Shou-Wen Wang
- Anne-Florence Bitbol
- Peter A. Wieringa
- Dimitra Dodou
- Matthew C. Tresch
Citations in the corpus
- Revealing evolutionary constraints on proteins through sequence analysis (2018, methodology): “The associated eigenvectors accurately recover both ~ D 1 and ~ D 2 , after a final step of Independent Component Analysis (ICA) [7, 53, 54] that successfully disentangles the contributions coming from the two constraints (see S1 Appendix).”
- Exploratory Factor Analysis With Small Sample Sizes (2009, methodology): “We made several attempts to estimate the correct number of factors in the first series of simulations by using Velicer's Minimum Average Partial ( O'Connor, 2000 ), a Bayesian Information Criterion ( Hansen, Larsen, & Kolenda, 2001 ), an automatic scree test ( Zhu & Ghodsi, 2006 ), and parallel anal”
- Factor recovery by principal axis factoring and maximum likelihood factor analysis as a function of factor pattern and sample size (2012, methodology): “There are a variety of methods that can assist in this decision, such as Velicer’s Minimum Average Partial [38], Bayesian Information Criterion [25], parallel analysis [38], and generalized degrees of freedom [10].”
- Matrix factorization algorithms for the identification of muscle synergies: evaluation on simulated and experimental data sets. (2006, methodology): “In particular, ICAPCA and pICA performed very well, followed by FA, NMF and ICA, then PCA (Fig.”