Generalizability vs. Robustness: Adversarial Examples for Medical Imaging

By Magdalini Paschali, Sailesh Conjeti, Fernando Navarro, Nassir Navab. 2018

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In this paper, for the first time, we propose an evaluation method for deep learning models that assesses the performance of a model not only in an unseen test scenario, but also in extreme cases of noise, outliers and ambiguous input data. To this end, we utilize adversarial examples, images that fool machine learning models, while looking imperceptibly different from original data, as a measure to evaluate the robustness of a variety of medical imaging models. Through extensive experiments on skin lesion classification and whole brain segmentation with state-of-the-art networks such as Inception and UNet, we show that models that achieve comparable performance regarding generalizability may have significant variations in their perception of the underlying data manifold, leading to an extensive performance gap in their robustness.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Biophysics

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Abhijit Guha Roy
  2. Christian Wachinger
  3. Nassir Navab
  4. Ala Al-Fuqaha
  5. Junaid Qadir
  6. Khansa Rasheed
  7. Mohamed Ghaly
  8. Adeel Razi

In Biophysics

  1. Nassir Navab
  2. Carl Vondrick
  3. Christian Wachinger
  4. Abhijit Guha Roy
  5. Adnan Qayyum

Citations in the corpus