Characterising Bias in Compressed Models

By Sara Hooker, Nyalleng Moorosi, Gregory Clark, Samy Bengio, Emily L. Denton. 2020

211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The popularity and widespread use of pruning and quantization is driven by the severe resource constraints of deploying deep neural networks to environments with strict latency, memory and energy requirements. These techniques achieve high levels of compression with negligible impact on top-line metrics (top-1 and top-5 accuracy). However, overall accuracy hides disproportionately high errors on a small subset of examples; we call this subset Compression Identified Exemplars (CIE). We further establish that for CIE examples, compression amplifies existing algorithmic bias. Pruning disproportionately impacts performance on underrepresented features, which often coincides with considerations of fairness. Given that CIE is a relatively small subset but a great contributor of error in the model, we propose its use as a human-in-the-loop auditing tool to surface a tractable subset of the dataset for further inspection or annotation by a domain expert. We provide qualitative and quantitative support that CIE surfaces the most challenging examples in the data distribution for human-in-the-loop auditing.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Furu Wei
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Neil Houlsby
  4. Yonatan Belinkov
  5. Julian McAuley
  6. Jianfeng Gao
  7. Yoav Goldberg
  8. Adina Williams

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Neil Houlsby
  3. Dacheng Tao
  4. Furu Wei
  5. Trevor Darrell
  6. Basil Mustafa
  7. Joan Puigcerver
  8. Jitendra Malik

In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

  1. Eric Michael Smith
  2. Martin Strobel
  3. Adina Williams
  4. Harini Suresh
  5. John V. Guttag
  6. Hong Chang
  7. Nitarshan Rajkumar
  8. David Krueger

Citations in the corpus