Can CSR classification be generally applied outside Britain?
By Bruno E. L. Cerabolini, G. Brusa, R. Ceriani, R. Andreis, A. Luzzaro, S. Pierce. Plant Ecology, 2010
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab2db824b29ba747918bbfe54ec6da6955e65115
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Eric Garnier
- Peter B. Reich
- Sandra Díaz
- Bill Shipley
- William K. Cornwell
- J. H. C. Cornelissen
- Francesco de Bello
- Michael Kleyer
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Eric Garnier
- Peter B. Reich
- S. Lavorel
- William K. Cornwell
- Bill Shipley
- Sandra Díaz
- Francesco de Bello
- J. H. C. Cornelissen
Citations in the corpus
- Allocating CSR plant functional types: the use of leaf economics and size traits to classify woody and herbaceous vascular plants (2013, methodology): “Herbaceous forbs occupied the entire CSR triangle (see also Cerabolini et al. 2010a), and graminoids exhibited a broad range of CSR strategies throughout most of the triangle, as also seen by Pierce et al. (2007b).”
- A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world‐wide (2017, background): “Specifically, in the European flora species characterized by high LA do not exhibit high SLA or high LDMC, species exhibiting high LDMC all have small, dense leaves and species with high SLA are small and exhibit low LDMC (Cerabolini et al. 2010).”
- CSR analysis of plant functional types in highly diverse tropical grasslands of harsh environments (2014, methodology): “…tolerance and competitiveness reflected both leaf economics and size spectra, previously recognized as the two main axes of plant specialization worldwide, considering the established phase of plant life cycles (Wright et al. 2004; Díaz et al. 2004; Cerabolini et al. 2010a; Pierce et al. 2012).”
- Ecology and evolution of plant diversity in the endangered campo rupestre: a neglected conservation priority (2015, background): “2004); b Leaf dry matter content (LDMC) of sandy grasslands and stony grasslands compared with the range of LDMC values for grasses, sedges and herbs from FIFTH database (n=506 species; Cerabolini et al. 2010); c Community weighted mean (CWM based on number of ramets) percentages of C-S-R strategies”