Missing value imputation: a review and analysis of the literature (2006–2017)
By Wei‐Chao Lin, Chih-Fong Tsai. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2019
549 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab2d4cb182a519bd53dba446051192e02bba49c2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Vadim Borisov
- Gjergji Kasneci
- Tobias Leemann
- Kathrin Sessler
- Martin Pawelczyk
- Gerhard Weikum
- Fabian M. Suchanek
- Thomas Neumann
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
In Statistics and Probability
- Vadim Borisov
- Gjergji Kasneci
- Mphago Banyatsang
- Tlamelo Emmanuel
- Tobias Leemann
- Kathrin Sessler
- Dimane Mpoeleng
- Martin Pawelczyk
Citations in the corpus
- Language Models are Realistic Tabular Data Generators (2022, background): “…(ii) contain critical person-related information and cannot be shared due to privacy protection or socio-ethical principles (Gasc´on et al., 2017), and (iii) often come with impurity issues such as noisy or missing values which impede the application of modern ML algorithms (Lin & Tsai, 2020).”
- A survey on missing data in machine learning (2021, methodology): “Expectation estimates missing values given observed data, whereas in maximisation, the present estimated values are used to maximize the probability of all the data [51].”
- Text embedding models can be great data engineers (2025, unknown): “Feature engineering and extraction steps deal with identifying features of the input timeseries encoding the information most relevant to the predictive analytics task at hand [27].”