Impact of Two Different Biochars on Earthworm Growth and Survival
By A. Liesch, S. Weyers, J. Gaskin, K. Das. 2010
145 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab1f185c428ee4e93faef57efb98059625102934
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- R. Bardgett
- N. Ostle
- X. Domene
- K. Hanley
- A. Enders
- Johannes Lehmann
- S. McCormack
- E. Moreno‐Jiménez
Citations in the corpus
- Short-term mesofauna responses to soil additions of corn stover biochar and the role of microbial biomass (2015, background): “, a poultry biochar (Liesch et al., 2010), which might have been detected with avoidance responses.”
- Biochar in bioenergy cropping systems: impacts on soil faunal communities and linked ecosystem processes (2013, background): “Neutral and alkaline soils tend to be more diverse in terms of both microbes and fauna (Edwards & Bohlen, 1996; Fierer & Jackson, 2006), but extreme liming can also be harmful to certain organisms; for instance, earthworms are generally not found in soils with a pH greater than eight (Liesch et al.,”
- Distributed biochar and bioenergy coproduction: a regionally specific case study of environmental benefits and economic impacts (2013, background): “, 2007), and macro- and microfauna viability (Liesch et al., 2010; Lehmann et al., 2011).”
- A review of biochars' potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils. (2011, background): “Liesch et al. (2010) found that whilst pine chip biochar had no effect on mortality or weight of E. fetida, poultry litter biochar caused 100% mortality in treatments above 67.5 Mg ha 1.”