Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution

By P. Maskell, A. Malmberg. 2007

515 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab1741d177c4dbc38783133c59420e7b33f5d5ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Defining Clusters of Related Industries (2014, background): “The conceptual limitation to region-specific approaches to define clusters is that such definitions are based on observed linkages among existing economic activities in a region (Bathelt et al., 2004; Maskell and Malmberg, 2007; Feser et al., 2009; Bathelt and Li, 2013).”
Cluster Evolution and a Roadmap for Future Research (2011, background): “However, there are not many studies that have focused on the evolution of the institutional setting in clusters (M askell and M almberg , 2007 ).”
Exogenous sources of regional industrial change (2018, background): “They tend to be ‘myopic’ to opportunities that lay beyond existing growth paths and face challenges to switch to new ones (Grabher, 1993; Maskell and Malmberg, 2007).”
Global cluster networks—foreign direct investment flows from Canada to China (2014, background): “Access to such ‘trans-local or global pipelines’ entails considerable uncertainties and high investment costs (Bathelt, 2007; Maskell and Malmberg, 2007).”
The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography (2011, background): “These studies show how a dynamic approach to institutions can be fruitfully linked to the study of industrial dynamics at the regional level, by investigating how regions are more likely to adapt their institutions to seize opportunities provided by new industries, or to enable the revival of mature”
Co-evolution in contemporary economic geography: towards a theoretical framework (2018, background): “Institutions do not come into existence once and forever, but undergo continuous modifications to adjust themselves to changing circumstances (Mahoney & Thelen, 2010; Maskell & Malmberg, 2007).”
Linkages and spillovers in global production networks: firm-level analysis of the Czech automotive industry (2016, background): “The exchange of information and interactions of firms within clusters may increase firms’ capabilities through processes of localized learning (Maskell and Malmberg, 1999, 2007; Bathelt et al., 2004).”
When Do Global Pipelines Enhance the Diffusion of Knowledge in Clusters? (2013, background): “Many studies have underlined the role of personal contacts as an effective way of transferring knowledge within clusters (Becattini 1990; Asheim 1994; Audretsch and Feldman 1996; Feldman 1999; Maskell and Malmberg 1999).”
The dark side of regional industrial path development: towards a typology of trajectories of decline (2019, background): “‘spatial myopia’, and thereby future lock-ins (Maskell and Malmberg, 2007; Zhu et al., 2017).”
The Aims and Scope of Evolutionary Economic Geography (2010, unknown): “institutional adaptation fails to take place (Maskell and Malmberg, 2007).”
Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces (2020, background): “Maskell and Malmberg (2007) observe that such processes lead to spatial myopia, which implies a selective perception of opportunities shared between individuals in a region.”
Evolution in Economic Geography: Institutions, Political Economy, and Adaptation (2009, background): “Institutions tend to be viewed as either constraining influences on individual agency (Maskell and Malmberg 2007), based on North’s writings, or as sets of arrangements that are subject to processes of coevolution in conjunction with technological innovation and industrial restructuring (Boschma…”
Perspectives on Cluster Evolution: Critical Review and Future Research Issues (2015, background): “…actual location of new clusters as the result of historical accidents, suggesting that new clusters often “start out in a particular location more or less by chance” (Maskell & Malmberg, 2007, p. 612), making it difficult to predict when and where clusters will arise (Braunerhjelm & Feldman, 2006).”