Bayesian Robust Optimization for Imitation Learning
By Daniel S. Brown, Scott Niekum, Marek Petrik. 2020
43 citations recorded by the source corpus.
One of the main challenges in imitation learning is determining what action an agent should take when outside the state distribution of the demonstrations. Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) can enable generalization to new states by learning a parameterized reward function, but these approaches still face uncertainty over the true reward function and corresponding optimal policy. Existing safe imitation learning approaches based on IRL deal with this uncertainty using a maxmin framework that optimizes a policy under the assumption of an adversarial reward function, whereas risk-neutral IRL approaches either optimize a policy for the mean or MAP reward function. While completely ignoring risk can lead to overly aggressive and unsafe policies, optimizing in a fully adversarial sense is also problematic as it can lead to overly conservative policies that perform poorly in practice. To provide a bridge between these two extremes, we propose Bayesian Robust Optimization for Imitation Learning (BROIL). BROIL leverages Bayesian reward function inference and a user specific risk tolerance to efficiently optimize a robust policy that balances expected return and conditional value at risk. Our empirical results show that BROIL provides a natural way to interpolate between return-maximizing and risk-minimizing behaviors and outperforms existing risk-sensitive and risk-neutral inverse reinforcement learning algorithms.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Reinforcement Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Scott Niekum
- Daniel S. Brown
- Emma Brunskill
- Sergey Levine
- Marek Petrik
- Bruno Castro da Silva
- Philip S. Thomas
- Ken Goldberg
In Reinforcement Learning
- Scott Niekum
- Emma Brunskill
- Sergey Levine
- Bruno Castro da Silva
- Daniel S. Brown
- Marek Petrik
- Philip S. Thomas
- Yash Chandak
Citations in the corpus
- Adversarial Training for High-Stakes Reliability (2022, background): “Most empirical work on techniques for aligning powerful AI [12, 13, 14, 15, 16] has focused on achieving good average-case performance in domains where no single action is catastrophic, for example using human trajectory rankings [17, 18, 19] or imitation learning [20, 21].”
- Universal Off-Policy Evaluation (2021, background): “Safety-critical applications, such as automated healthcare, require minimizing the chances of risk-prone outcomes, and so performance metrics such as value at risk (VaR) or conditional value at risk (CVaR) are more appropriate [49, 14].”
- Policy Gradient Bayesian Robust Optimization for Imitation Learning (2021, methodology): “However, prior work on Bayesian reward learning often only optimizes policies for the expected or MAP reward estimate over the learned posterior (Ramachandran & Amir, 2007; Choi & Kim, 2011; Brown et al., 2020a).”