Transplantation of the Subshrub Lotus scoparius: Testing the Home‐Site Advantage Hypothesis

By A. Montalvo, N. Ellstrand. 2000

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab13058ffea3dc38d0b3ec77c365dcfe4b61fcf0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Introduction Strategies Put to the Test: Local Adaptation versus Heterosis (2004, background): “However, numerous researchers have shown the effects of local adaptation by measuring the higher performance of local relative to distant transplants (Schemske 1984; Silander 1985; Waser & Price 1985; Schmitt & Gamble 1990; Wang et al. 1997; Montalvo & Ellstrand 2000a, 2000b, 2001).”
Critical Elements for Biologically Based Recovery Plans of Aquatic‐Breeding Amphibians (2002, background): “The primary concerns are to maintain locally adapted gene complexes and to reduce the chance of outbreeding or inbreeding depression, both of which can reduce the viability and success of founders (Templeton 1986; Montalvo et al. 1997; Montalvo & Ellstrand 2000).”
A question of origin: Where and how to collect seed for ecological restoration (2010, background): “…of seed zone would be only valid for populations of the same habitat type, i.e. the zones ht tp :// do c. re ro .c h have to be defined on the basis of environmental distance, which is only weakly correlated with geographical distance (Montalvo & Ellstrand 2000; Smith et al. 2005; Wilkinson 2001).”
Ecological rather than geographic or genetic distance affects local adaptation of the rare perennial herb, Aster amellus (2007, background): “The home-site advantage hypothesis also predicts that the relative success of introduced plants will decrease as distance to the population of origin increases (Montalvo and Ellstrand, 2000).”
Landscape Restoration: Moving from Generalities to Methodologies (2003, methodology): “For example, restoration provides an excellent opportunity to test the relative importance of local adaptation versus inbreeding depression in plants by comparing establishment and success of sites planted from local versus nonlocal seed sources (Montalvo and Ellstrand 2000b).”
Restoring species through reintroductions: strategies for source population selection (2015, methodology): “…be used as a proxy for genetic similarity as there is often a correlation between the two variables (e.g. r = 0.22–0.52 for two studies on plants, Montalvo & Ellstrand 2000; Raabová et al. 2007); albeit, direct estimates of genetic similarity had a stronger relationship with the fitness-related…”
Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential (2008, background): “Local adaptation was first observed by Turesson in 1925 and has since been demonstrated in several species (Montalvo and Ellstrand 2000; Joshi et al. 2001; Hufford and Mazer 2003).”
Evolution of plant materials for ecological restoration: insights from the applied and basic literature (2017, background): “…population is to use an initial seed mix containing local genotypes (Grady et al. 2011; Dyer, Knapp & Rice 2016), and genotypes from ecologically similar, but geographically more distant populations (Montalvo & Ellstrand 2000; Bischoff et al. 2006; Broadhurst et al. 2008; Woolbright et al. 2014).”
“How Local Is Local?”—A Review of Practical and Conceptual Issues in the Genetics of Restoration (2005, background): “Key words: ecotype, local adaptation, outbreeding depression, restoration, seed zones.”