Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect

By Julian P. T. Higgins, Tianjing Li, J. Deeks. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2019

1,463 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab0d65ff80529e765d09d0d692720dc9780e0963

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Michelle Vaccaro
2. Thomas W. Malone
3. Abdullah Almaatouq

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Michelle Vaccaro
2. Thomas W. Malone
3. Abdullah Almaatouq

In Statistics and Probability

1. Michelle Vaccaro
2. Thomas W. Malone
3. Abdullah Almaatouq

Citations in the corpus

• When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2024, positive): “For these, we calculated the standard deviations using the appropriate formulas 59 .”
• Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses (2024, neutral): “52 Moreover, the synthesis of results based on three or fewer original research articles may contribute to heterogeneity and imprecision, 53 affecting outcomes assessed in our review such as certain cancers, asthma, and intermediate cardiometabolic risk factors.”