What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor
By Matthew S. McGlone. 2007
239 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aaf877806caf3b2259e6b0f0e9245b8d08ab3056
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Gerard Steen
- Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.
- Christian Burgers
- T. Krennmayr
- Elena Semino
- Gudrun Reijnierse
- Herbert L. Colston
- Deirdre Wilson
In Language and Linguistics
- Gerard Steen
- Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.
- Christian Burgers
- T. Krennmayr
- Gudrun Reijnierse
- A. Musolff
- John A. Barnden
- Andrew Gargett
In Literature and Literary Theory
Citations in the corpus
- Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues (2017, background): “I have argued above that this is simply not true: DMT includes all of this work but raises critical questions about its interpretation (cf. McGlone 2007) while aligning in various ways with other experimental work that proposes alternative models, such as Gentner and Bowdle (2008), Giora (2008),…”
- Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory (2011, background): “…concluded, “Its atmospheric influence notwithstanding, the [conceptual metaphor] view has not fared well theoretically or empirically” (McGlone, 2007, p. 122); and, as a consequence, raised strong doubts about “the explanatory value of the ‘conceptual metaphor’ construct” (McGlone, 2007, p. 109).”
- The Paradox of Metaphor: Why We Need a Three-Dimensional Model of Metaphor (2008, background): “The fact that words are polysemous is often used as an argument against their metaphorical status (cf. Murphy, 1996, 1997; McGlone, 2007), but this argument only works if the underlying model of polysemy excludes metaphorically motivated polysemy.”