Accuracy of cloud liquid water path from ground‐based microwave radiometry 2. Sensor accuracy and synergy

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Retrieving Liquid Wat0er Path and Precipitable Water Vapor From the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Microwave Radiometers (2007, unknown): “frequencies used in the retrieval [19].”
The Atmospheric radiation measurement (ARM) program network of microwave radiometers: instrumentation, data, and retrievals (2013, background): “The choice of frequencies and design of the new ra- diometers has been driven by the scientific need to improve the accuracy in the retrieval of low amounts of integrated water vapor and cloud liquid water (Crewell and Löhnert, 2003; Racette et al., 2005; Cimini et al., 2007).”
Accuracy of cloud liquid water path from ground‐based microwave radiometry 1. Dependency on cloud model statistics (2003, methodology): “The value 30 g m 2 is chosen because it roughly represents the detection limit of LWP with two-channel radiometers [Crewell and Löhnert, 2003].”
A ground‐based multisensor cloud phase classifier (2007, methodology): “This shortcoming can be improved upon by employing the latest absorption models [e.g., Turner et al., 2007], by combining infrared and microwave measurements [Turner, 2007], and/ or by adding higher-frequency channels to the retrieval [Crewell and Lohnert, 2003].”