Programming Environments: Environmentality and Citizen Sensing in the Smart City

By Jennifer Gabrys. 2014

638 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Media Technology, Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aaef7f45057e9f8dbcc5998d966515d50bcadffe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Media Technology

1. Nick Taylor Buck
2. Josefin Wangel
3. Mattias Höjer
4. A. While
5. R. Hollands

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Nick Taylor Buck
2. Daan Schraven
3. Josefin Wangel
4. Mattias Höjer
5. A. While
6. R. Hollands

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Nick Taylor Buck
2. Josefin Wangel
3. Mattias Höjer
4. A. While
5. R. Hollands

Citations in the corpus

• Competitive urbanism and the limits to smart city innovation: The UK Future Cities initiative (2017, background): “…have stimulated a significant wave of city experiments, mainly initiated by national governments seeking to promote innovation or private-sector companies seeking to demonstrate their goods and services (Batty et al., 2012; Evans and Karvonen, 2014; Gabrys, 2014; Karvonen and van Heur, 2014).”
• Smart Sustainable Cities: Definition and Challenges (2015, background): “Gabrys [12] find the roots of the concept earlier, namely from what they call the ‘‘cybernetically planned cities’’ of the 1960s, in proposals for networked or computable cities in urban development plans from the 1980s onwards.”
• Critical interventions into the corporate smart city (2015, background): “…this urban panacea is increasingly being packaged and promoted is that it can only be effectively delivered through a corporate vision of smartness, in conjunction with an entrepreneurial form of urban governance (Harvey, 1989) and a largely compliant and accommodating citizenry (Gabrys, 2014).”
• The Smart City as Global Discourse: Storylines and Critical Junctures across 27 Cities (2019, background): “…smart city is interrogated in terms 4 S. JOSS ET AL. of its potential to recondition norms and practices of citizenship, the public sphere, and social engagement (e.g., Linders, 2012; Gabrys, 2014; Saunders and Baeck, 2015; Cowley et al., 2017; Joss et al., 2018; Cardullo and Kitchin, 2017, 2018).”