Cultural and Institutional Determinants of Social Dominance Orientation: A Cross‐Cultural Meta‐Analysis of 27 Societies

By Ronald Fischer, Katja Hanke, Chris G. Sibley. 2012

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aae19b0c07e8f87e871a41171ca4e81dc301861a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Chris G. Sibley
2. Ryan Perry
3. J. Duckitt
4. J. Sidanius
5. Nour S. Kteily
6. Kristof Dhont
7. Héctor Carvacho
8. J. Sheehy‐Skeffington

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Chris G. Sibley
2. Ryan Perry
3. J. Duckitt
4. J. Sidanius
5. Nour S. Kteily
6. Kristof Dhont
7. J. Sheehy‐Skeffington
8. Héctor Carvacho

Citations in the corpus

• Social Dominance Theory: Explorations in the Psychology of Oppression (2016, background): “, Fischer et al., 2012). Second, we are in need of more research devoted to an examination of crosslevel processes. We must begin to focus on the manner in which processes at one level of analysis both affect and are affected by processes at other levels of analysis (see, e.g., Hedström & Ylikoski, ”
• Dangerous and competitive worldviews: A meta-analysis of their associations with Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism (2013, methodology): “As demonstrated in past meta-analyses (Cohrs & Stelzl, 2010; Fischer et al., 2012) however, this does not tend to be evident in mean levels of SDO.”