Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka.

By G. Wakabayashi, D. Cherqui, David A. Geller, J. Buell, H. Kaneko, Ho-Seong Han, H. Asbun, Nicholas OʼRourke, M. Tanabe, A. Koffron and 33 more. Annals of Surgery, 2015

1,311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Hepatology, Oncology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aad6693f80d6cbb8a04ba97653b64cc86f09b3df

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Hepatology

1. J. Llovet
2. V. Mazzaferro
3. Alejandro Forner1 , 2
4. Peter R. Galle
5. F. Piscaglia
6. J. Raoul
7. V. Vilgrain
8. P. Schirmacher

In Oncology

1. V. Mazzaferro
2. J. Llovet

Citations in the corpus

• Comparative Short-term Benefits of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: 9000 Cases and Climbing (2016, methodology): “The present review was made in preparation of the Second Consensus Conference that was held on October 3 to October 5, 2014, in Morioka, Japan, and whose conclusions were just published in the Annals of Surgery.(15) The main aim of this current study was to analyze the world literature of LLR.”
• EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. (2018, background): “Reported morbidity and mortality in major laparoscopic-robotic LR series collected in very early and early HCC are 10–15% (including laparotomic conversions) and 1%, respectively.(371,372)”