Measuring Scholarly Impact
By Ludvig Bohlin, Daniel Edler, Andrea Lancichinetti, Martin Rosval. Cambridge International Law Journal, 2014
407 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aacd2364fae5425e20202318a9211e5a8503ce7a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Knowledge Management in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Mapping the Literature and Scoping Future Avenues (2021, methodology): “Following the methodological prescriptions in [18, 21], the dataset was reviewed by all four authors, and interpretations were discussed through several vis-à-vis interactions to double-check the selected keywords and papers assigned to a specific stream in each cluster.”
- Advances in management research: a bibliometric overview of the Review of Managerial Science (2020, background): “2019), family business (Xi et al. 2015), and operations research (Merigó and Yang 2017).”