Unity and discord in opinion dynamics

83 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Science vs Conspiracy: Collective Narratives in the Age of Misinformation (2014, background): “A large body of literature addresses the study of social dynamics on socio-technical systems from social contagion up to social reinforcement [19–37].”
On Krause's Multi-Agent Consensus Model With State-Dependent Connectivity (2008, methodology): “The behav ior of the Deffuant-Wesibuch model — and in particular the final positions of the clusters — has also been studied by considering a continuous density approximating the discre te distribution of agents, and examining the partial differen tial equation describing the evolution of this densi”
Kinetic models of opinion formation (2006, background): “The first one is the remarkably simple compromise process, in which pairs of agents reach a fair compromise after exchanging opinions [2, 3, 8, 10, 12, 26, 30].”
Fokker–Planck equations in the modeling of socio-economic phenomena (2017, background): “[30, 36, 42, 56, 89] Likewise, the dynamics of opinion formation in a multi-agent society has received growing attention.[12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 34, 41, 46, 52, 53, 54, 55, 91, 96] In view of the relation between parameters in the microscopic interaction rules, the society develops a certain 1”