STRIDES: a 3.9 per cent measurement of the Hubble constant from the strong lens system DES J0408−5354

By Anowar J. Shajib, Simon Birrer, T. Treu, A. Agnello, Elizabeth Buckley-Geer, J. Chan, L. Christensen, C. Lemon, H. Lin, M. Millon and 81 more. Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2019

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present a blind time-delay cosmographic analysis for the lens system DES J0408−5354. This system is extraordinary for the presence of two sets of multiple images at different redshifts, which provide the opportunity to obtain more information at the cost of increased modelling complexity with respect to previously analysed systems. We perform detailed modelling of the mass distribution for this lens system using three band Hubble Space Telescope imaging. We combine the measured time delays, line-of-sight central velocity dispersion of the deflector, and statistically constrained external convergence with our lens models to estimate two cosmological distances. We measure the ‘effective’ time-delay distance corresponding to the redshifts of the deflector and the lensed quasar $D_{\Delta t}^{\rm eff}=$$3382_{-115}^{+146}$ Mpc and the angular diameter distance to the deflector Dd = $1711_{-280}^{+376}$ Mpc, with covariance between the two distances. From these constraints on the cosmological distances, we infer the Hubble constant H0= $74.2_{-3.0}^{+2.7}$ km s−1 Mpc−1 assuming a flat ΛCDM cosmology and a uniform prior for Ωm as $\Omega _{\rm m} \sim \mathcal {U}(0.05, 0.5)$. This measurement gives the most precise constraint on H0 to date from a single lens. Our measurement is consistent with that obtained from the previous sample of six lenses analysed by the H0 Lenses in COSMOGRAIL’s Wellspring (H0LiCOW) collaboration. It is also consistent with measurements of H0 based on the local distance ladder, reinforcing the tension with the inference from early Universe probes, for example, with 2.2σ discrepancy from the cosmic microwave background measurement.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aac13c0486c10af740ef0062276a72222266a046

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. T. Treu
  2. T. Collett
  3. Leon V. E. Koopmans
  4. Dominique Sluse
  5. M. Auger
  6. P. J. Marshall
  7. C. Fassnacht
  8. Sherry H. Suyu

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Leon V. E. Koopmans
  2. T. Treu
  3. M. Auger
  4. Dominique Sluse
  5. Sherry H. Suyu
  6. C. Fassnacht
  7. Stefan Hilbert
  8. A. Bolton

Citations in the corpus