Affective Interference: An Explanation for Negative Attention Biases in Dysphoria?

By Greg J. Siegle, R. Ingram, G. Matt. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2002

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Rethinking Rumination (2008, background): “Further evidence for this link comes from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies that show that rumination is associated with increased amygdala activity during the processing of emotional stimuli (Ray et al., 2005; Siegle, Ingram, & Matt, 2002).”
Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: An fMRI study (2005, background): “…in a meta-analysis of seven studies Siegle (1996; Unpublished Master's Thesis, http://www.pitt.edu/~gsiegle) found significantly faster response latencies for positive compared with negative, and positive compared with neutral words in normal subjects (for a review on LDT, see Siegle et al., 2002).”
An evaluation of early and late stage attentional processing of positive and negative information in dysphoria (2007, background): “A further possibility is that dysphoria may be characterised by a relative bias toward negative information (in relation to positive information), rather than an absolute bias toward either bias type (see Siegle, Ingram, & Matt, 2002 , for the suggestion that dysphorics’ negative biases may come ”