A STANDARDIZED GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION MEASURE

By P. Hedrick. Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2005

1,843 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aabdb0dd06ca38b59ef5a3cde56fb1ff47683d46

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Directional genetic differentiation and relative migration (2013, neutral): “The most commonly used measures, utilizing this information, being Wright’s ﬁxation index F st (Wright 1943), Nei’s G st (Nei 1973), and the more recently introduced G 0 st (Hedrick and Goodnight 2005) and D (Jost 2008), which are independent of gene diversity.”
Genetic Consequences of Habitat Fragmentation in Black-and-Gold Howler (Alouatta caraya) Populations from Northern Argentina (2010, background): “It is typically accepted that FST values of ca. 0.15 indicate significant genetic differentiation among subpopulations or groups (Frankham et al. 2002; Hedrick 2005).”
Assessment of the Genetic Diversity in Forest Tree Populations Using Molecular Markers (2014, methodology): “GST; [58,60]).”
Footprints on water: the genetic wake of dispersal among reefs (2007, background): “Hedrick (2005) suggested a simple way to standardize FST that would allow for such comparisons (see also Meirmans 2006 for software that implements an improved way to do this).”
Detecting and measuring genetic differentiation (2016, methodology): “Recent realization of the problem in relation to the estimation of population partitioning has resulted in a proliferation of standardization procedures for F -statistics (Meirmans 2006), G-statistics (Hedrick 2005), a novel method (Dest) of assessing differentiation (Jost 2008), and some understand”
Colonization routes of Pinus sylvestris inferred from distribution of mitochondrial DNA variation (2008, methodology): “A standardized measure of GST, GST′ was calculated according to Hedrick (2005) to remove the effect of level of polymorphism on the estimate.”
Phylogeography of New Zealand's coastal benthos (2009, methodology): “Despite controversy over the use of F-statistics as a measure of relative differentiation (Hedrick 1999, 2005; Neigel 2002; Palumbi 2003; Bradbury & Betzen 2007; Jost 2008), FST and its analogues are the measures of genetic differentiation most frequently used in population genetics and therefore…”
Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. (2006, neutral): “…heterozygosity and FST can apparently occur at high-mutation rate loci (O’Reilly et al. 2004; Olsen et al. 2004) but can be accounted for by breaking loci into subgroups for analysis, or using modifiers that make loci more comparable (Buonaccorsi et al. 2002; Olsen et al. 2004; Hedrick 2005).”
Gene Flow in Complex Landscapes: Testing Multiple Hypotheses with Causal Modeling (2006, background): “The parameter , a standardized form of GST that is scaled by the ′GST maximum level possible given the observed amount of genetic variation (Hedrick 2005), is 0.097 between the Selkirk and Purcell Mountains.”
Mitochondrial DNA under siege in avian phylogeography (2008, background): “This can give the impression that there is substantial population structure when in fact, one must judge whether an FST of 0.03 (for example) is biologically significant (e.g. Hedrick 2005).”