Learning Dexterous Manipulation Policies from Experience and Imitation

By Vikash Kumar, Abhishek Gupta, E. Todorov, Sergey Levine. 2016

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We explore learning-based approaches for feedback control of a dexterous five-finger hand performing non-prehensile manipulation. First, we learn local controllers that are able to perform the task starting at a predefined initial state. These controllers are constructed using trajectory optimization with respect to locally-linear time-varying models learned directly from sensor data. In some cases, we initialize the optimizer with human demonstrations collected via teleoperation in a virtual environment. We demonstrate that such controllers can perform the task robustly, both in simulation and on the physical platform, for a limited range of initial conditions around the trained starting state. We then consider two interpolation methods for generalizing to a wider range of initial conditions: deep learning, and nearest neighbors. We find that nearest neighbors achieve higher performance. Nevertheless, the neural network has its advantages: it uses only tactile and proprioceptive feedback but no visual feedback about the object (i.e. it performs the task blind) and learns a time-invariant policy. In contrast, the nearest neighbors method switches between time-varying local controllers based on the proximity of initial object states sensed via motion capture. While both generalization methods leave room for improvement, our work shows that (i) local trajectory-based controllers for complex non-prehensile manipulation tasks can be constructed from surprisingly small amounts of training data, and (ii) collections of such controllers can be interpolated to form more global controllers. Results are summarized in the supplementary video: this https URL

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, Control and Systems Engineering, Reinforcement Learning, Robotics & Control

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Pieter Abbeel
  3. Vikash Kumar
  4. Aravind Rajeswaran
  5. E. Todorov
  6. Chelsea Finn
  7. Abhishek Gupta
  8. Nicolas Manfred Otto Heess

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Pieter Abbeel
  3. Chelsea Finn
  4. Abhishek Gupta
  5. Vikash Kumar
  6. Aviral Kumar
  7. Nicolas Manfred Otto Heess
  8. Aravind Rajeswaran

In Control and Systems Engineering

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Pieter Abbeel
  3. Chelsea Finn
  4. Vikash Kumar
  5. Abhishek Gupta
  6. Aravind Rajeswaran
  7. Nicolas Manfred Otto Heess
  8. Yuke Zhu

In Reinforcement Learning

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Pieter Abbeel
  3. Chelsea Finn
  4. Vikash Kumar
  5. Abhishek Gupta
  6. Shixiang Shane Gu
  7. Aravind Rajeswaran
  8. Ofir Nachum

In Robotics & Control

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Pieter Abbeel
  3. Chelsea Finn
  4. Vikash Kumar
  5. Aravind Rajeswaran
  6. Yuke Zhu
  7. Abhishek Gupta
  8. Nicolas Manfred Otto Heess

Citations in the corpus