Investigating the Impact of Pre-trained Word Embeddings on Memorization in Neural Networks
By A. Thomas, David Ifeoluwa Adelani, Ali Davody, Aditya Mogadala, Dietrich Klakow. 2020
39 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Representation & Self-Supervised Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning
- Armen Aghajanyan
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Nicholas Carlini
- Kushal Tirumala
- Daphne Ippolito
- Florian Tramèr
- Katherine Lee
- Matthew Jagielski
Citations in the corpus
- Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Models (2022, background): “, 2020; Ziegler, 2021), or in other work, synthetically injected “canaries” (Carlini et al., 2019; Henderson et al., 2017; Thakkar et al., 2020; Thomas et al., 2020).”
- Counterfactual Memorization in Neural Language Models (2021, methodology): “…work on memorization in neural language models demonstrated the ability to extract memorized training data, including sensitive data such as phone numbers and usernames [Carlini et al., 2020, Ziegler, 2021, Carlini et al., 2019, Henderson et al., 2017, Thakkar et al., 2020, Thomas et al., 2020].”
- Bag of Tricks for Training Data Extraction from Language Models (2023, background): “Despite being a relatively new task, many of the underlying technologies and analysis methods, including membership inference (Shokri et al., 2017) and leveraging network memorization for attacks (Thomas et al., 2020; Leino & Fredrikson, 2020), were introduced much earlier.”
- Memorization Without Overfitting: Analyzing the Training Dynamics of Large Language Models (2022, background): “Memorization in Language Models: Unintended memorization is a known challenge for language models [12, 13], which makes them open to extraction attacks [14, 15] and membership inference attacks [16, 17], although there has been work on mitigating these vulnerabilities [11, 18].”