The global CMT project 2004–2010: Centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes

2,697 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The GEM Global Active Faults Database (2020, background): “…datasets for seismicity (such as catalogs from the USGS National Earthquake Information Center, or the Global Centroid Moment Tensor project; Ekström et al., 2012), topography (e.g. Rosen et al., 2000), and GNSS geodesy allowed individual or small groups of academic researchers to produce…”
Source rupture processes of the foreshock and mainshock in the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence estimated from the kinematic waveform inversion of strong motion data (2016, background): “Brown lines represent surface traces of active faults compiled by Nakata and Imaizumi (2002). b Moment tensor solutions of foreshock and mainshock determined by F-net of NIED (Fukuyama et al. 1998) and Global CMT Project (Ekström et al. 2012)”
Global adjoint tomography—model GLAD-M25 (2020, methodology): “In addition to the 253 earthquakes used for the construction of GLAD-M15, we initially selected 784 additional earthquakes from the global Centroid-Moment Tensor (CMT) cata-log (e.g., Ekstr¨om et al. 2012), resulting in a total number of 1,040 earthquakes.”