BEGAN: Boundary Equilibrium Generative Adversarial Networks
By David Berthelot, Tom Schumm, Luke Metz. 2017
1,207 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We propose a new equilibrium enforcing method paired with a loss derived from the Wasserstein distance for training auto-encoder based Generative Adversarial Networks. This method balances the generator and discriminator during training. Additionally, it provides a new approximate convergence measure, fast and stable training and high visual quality. We also derive a way of controlling the trade-off between image diversity and visual quality. We focus on the image generation task, setting a new milestone in visual quality, even at higher resolutions. This is achieved while using a relatively simple model architecture and a standard training procedure.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Generative Models
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Dacheng Tao
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Xiaogang Wang
- Trevor Darrell
- Jitendra Malik
- Bernt Schiele
- Yi Yang
In Generative Models
- Stefano Ermon
- Jun-Yan Zhu
- Richard Zhang
- Eli Shechtman
- Daniel Cohen-Or
- Jiaming Song
- Bolei Zhou
- Yang Song
Citations in the corpus
- Image Transformer (2018, background): “, 2015), motivating a large number of methods attempting to make their training more robust (Metz et al., 2016; Berthelot et al., 2017).”
- Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Study (2017, methodology): “Various flavors of GANs have been recently proposed, both purely unsupervised [9, 1, 10, 5] as well as conditional [20, 21].”
- Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variation (2017, background): “GANs produce sharp images, albeit only in fairly small resolutions and with somewhat limited variation, and the training continues to be unstable despite recent progress (Salimans et al., 2016; Gulrajani et al., 2017; Berthelot et al., 2017; Kodali et al., 2017).”
- Diagnosing and Enhancing VAE Models (2019, background): “7 Additionally, we present results from (Lucic et al., 2018) involving numerous competing GAN models, including MM GAN (Goodfellow et al., 2014), WGAN (Arjovsky et al., 2017), WGAN-GP (Gulrajani et al., 2017), NS GAN (Fedus et al., 2017), DRAGAN (Ko-dali et al., 2017), LS GAN (Mao et al., 2017) and ”
- Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs (2017, neutral): “Nonlinearity (G) [ReLU, LeakyReLU, softplus(2x+2) 2 1, tanh] Nonlinearity (D) [ReLU, LeakyReLU, softplus(2x+2) 2 1, tanh] Depth (G) [4, 8, 12, 20] Depth (D) [4, 8, 12, 20] Batch norm (G) [True, False] Batch norm (D; layer norm for WGAN-GP) [True, False] Base filter count (G) [32, 64, 128] Base filte”
- Negative Momentum for Improved Game Dynamics (2018, background): “Unfortunately, they are generally known to be difficult to train (Berthelot et al., 2017; Radford et al., 2015).”
- Coulomb GANs: Provably Optimal Nash Equilibria via Potential Fields (2017, background): “Generative adversarial networks (GANs) [13] excel at constructing realistic images [36, 28, 24, 2, 4] and text [17].”
- Which Training Methods for GANs do actually Converge? (2018, background): “For the first class of stable equilibria, which we call energy solutions , the equilibrium discriminator forms an energy function for the true data distributions and might be a partial explanation for the success of autoencoder-based discrim-inators (Zhao et al., 2016; Berthelot et al., 2017).”
- Demystifying MMD GANs (2018, background): “Note that the proof of Theorem 3 does not readily extend to generalized IPMs, and so does not tell us whether an unbiased estimator of the MMD GAN objective (14) can exist.”
- GANs Trained by a Two Time-Scale Update Rule Converge to a Nash Equilibrium (2017, methodology): “The best FIDs that could be obtained with the original BEGANs and TTUR trained BEGANs are 28.55 and 26.19, respectively (see Table 1).”
- Generating Adversarial Examples with Adversarial Networks (2018, background): “Most of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) (Goodfellow et al., 2014) have achieved visually appealing results in both image generation (Radford et al., 2015; Gulrajani et al., 2017; Berthelot et al., 2017) and manipulation (Zhu et al., 2016) settings.”
- The Robust Manifold Defense: Adversarial Training using Generative Models (2017, methodology): “We show attacks for a gender classifier trained on CelebA [30] and protected with the INC framework using a BEGAN [6] generator.”
- Synthesizing Tabular Data using Generative Adversarial Networks (2018, background): “Generative Adversarial Networks Since GANs were first proposed, many efforts have been made to speed up and stabilize the training process [42, 1, 18, 4], with application-based studies mainly focusing on generating images.”
- RUDDER: Return Decomposition for Delayed Rewards (2018, background): “The entropy coefficient is replaced by Proportional Control [11, 10].”
- Counterfactuals uncover the modular structure of deep generative models (2018, methodology): “com/Heumi/BEGAN-tensorflow) Boundary Equilibrium GAN (BEGAN) (Berthelot et al., 2017), which used to set a milestone in visual quality for higher resolution face images.”
- Expectation Learning for Adaptive Crossmodal Stimuli Association (2018, background): “of the Wasserstein distance between the loss of the autoencoder reconstruction for real and generated data as a loss function [15].”
- Adversarial Audio Synthesis (2018, background): “But despite their increasing fidelity at synthesizing images (Radford et al., 2016; Berthelot et al., 2017; Karras et al., 2018), GANs have yet to be demonstrated capable of synthesizing audio in an unsupervised setting.”