Incumbents and protectionism: The political economy of foreign entry liberalization

By Anusha Chari, Nandini Gupta. 2008

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa6b30ec4e05e7fd4d739c9d9e74e1d8d00ef60b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

In with the Big, Out with the Small (2014, unknown): “…privatization, firm size distribution and firm dynamics, the political economy of FDI liberalization, product switching, and the use of imported intermediate goods ( see, among others, Gupta 2005; Chari and Gupta 2008; Alfaro and Chari 2009, 2014; Goldberg et al. 2010a, b; DeLoecker et al. 2016 .”
Firm-specific information and the efficiency of investment (2008, background): “For example, incumbent firms may lose monopoly rents if liberalization increases access to capital and facilitates entry into sectors that were previously dominated by a few firms (Chari and Gupta, 2007).”
Multiproduct Firms and Product Turnover in the Developing World: Evidence from India (2010, unknown): “(2002), Khanna and Palepu (1999), Fisman and Khanna (2004), Topalova (2007), Dinc and Gupta (2007), and Chari and Gupta (2007). 6 Product-level information is available for the 1997/98, 2000/01 and 2001/02 rounds of the Annual Survey of Industries (ASI), but there is no information in years close to”
Sustaining superior performance in an emerging economy: an empirical test in the Indian context (2012, methodology): “The CMIE data is fairly comprehensive in its coverage of Indian firms and has been used extensively in prior research (Chari and Gupta, 2008; Khanna and Palepu, 2000b).”
On the Growth Effect of Stock Market Liberalizations (2009, unknown): “Governmentowned firms are often successful at using their political connections to obtain protection from competition (Chari and Gupta 2008).”
Politicians and the IPO decision: The impact of impending political promotions on IPO activity in China (2014, background): “…and financial resources engage in less efficient investment behavior, especially as it relates to the divestiture of underperforming assets, while Chari and Gupta (2008) show that the presence of a strong, state-owned incumbent firm creates incentives for local politicians to limit foreign…”
Labor Markets and the Demand for Foreign Direct Investment (2010, background): “…productivity effects of FDI for Mexico, Venezuela, and the United States suggesting that the capital owners are net losers+ Blonigen, Davies, and Head 2003; and Chari and Gupta 2008 show that FDI inflows reduce profits accruing to local producers+ Sembenelli and Siotis 2008 show that, in the…”
Services Reform and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from India (2012, unknown): “5 5 Chari and Gupta (2008) provide evidence that the de-licensing reforms in India in 1991 categorized certain more concentrated and less competitive industries as strategic and shielded them from foreign competition by maintaining barriers to foreign direct investment.”