‘If you sound like me, you must be more human’: On the interplay of robot and user features on human-robot acceptance and anthropomorphism

By Friederike A. Eyssel, Dieta Kuchenbrandt, Simon Bobinger, Laura E. de Ruiter, Frank Hegel. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2012

313 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa20cd74bd14c688d63e8cf064ca8b6f53870512

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Diane Proudfoot
2. Christoph Bartneck
3. Jakub Złotowski
4. Kumar Yogeeswaran

In Social Psychology

1. Diane Proudfoot
2. Christoph Bartneck
3. Jakub Złotowski
4. Kumar Yogeeswaran
5. Julia Fink

Citations in the corpus

• Anthropomorphism: Opportunities and Challenges in Human–Robot Interaction (2014, background): “Furthermore, anthropomorphism is the result not only of a robot’s actions, but also of an observer’s characteristics, such asmotivation [53], social background [55], gender [61], and age [88].”
• A Systematic Review of Attitudes, Anxiety, Acceptance, and Trust Towards Social Robots (2020, unknown): “[46] [117] [62] [49] [104] [59] [47] [61] [52] [118] [94] [35] [112] [122] [119] [45] [28] [79] [87] [51] [101] [56] [92] [80] We found an average weighted mean of ¯ x w 0.10 for anxiety, indicating that, in general, people only feel slightly anxious about social robots.”