The Judiciary Is a They, Not an It: Two Fallacies of Interpretive Theory

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Exclusionary Amenities in Residential Communities (2005, background): “To the extent that focal point messages are misinterpreted, see their meaning change over time, or reach an audience without particularly widespread preferences for homogeneity, the presence of an expensive sorting device will be a critical guarantee that a homogenous population will arise in the fi”
Willingness to Pay versus Welfare (2007, background): “19 reported “dissatisfaction” from 21 percent to 35 percent.(49) Hence it is not easy to establish any kind of correlation between economic growth and increases in subjective welfare.”
The Sympathetic Discriminator: Mental Illness and the ADA (2004, background): “under the ADA, the question of whether Alan would actually be able to assert his claim under the ADA as currently interpreted by the courts is a surprisingly complicated one.(49)”
Information Asymmetries and the Rights to Exclude (2005, background): “To the contrary, governance functions as an important supplement to fine-grained exclusion.(49) But it appears that in many fraternities and sororities bouncer’s exclusion is instrumental in promoting a particular community character, and the exclusion of potential misfits”