Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
By F. Maeda, J. Keenan, J. Tormos, H. Topka, Alvaro Pascual-Leone. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2000
722 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9e4c4ae349f23ba7635ca45274472745ccf3dac
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Simon B. Eickhoff
- Alvaro Pascual-Leone
- Michael A. Nitsche
- Amir Amedi
- Felipe Fregni
- John C. Rothwell
- Walter Paulus
- Hartwig Roman Siebner
In Neurology
- Michael A. Nitsche
- Alvaro Pascual-Leone
- Walter Paulus
- Felipe Fregni
- John C. Rothwell
- Hartwig Roman Siebner
- N. Lang
- Amir Amedi
In Psychiatry and Mental health
Citations in the corpus
- Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex (2001, methodology): “We used a recently developed rTMS protocol, which from previous studie”
- Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). (2014, neutral): “The duration of such after-effects increases with the number of stimuli delivered, and may persist minutes to hours or even days after the end of an rTMS session (Chen et al., 1997; Maeda et al., 2000; Touge et al., 2001; Gangitano et al., 2002).”
- Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. (2014, background): “Nevertheless, it is interesting to note that similar assessments of the variability of the excitatory PAS25 protocol [9,11,29e32], 1 Hz rTMS [33], and theta-burst TMS [10,12e15,34] all give similarly variable results in which one third to one half of participants fail to respond in the “canonical” m”
- Preconditioning of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence for Homeostatic Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex (2004, background): “We propose that differences in the recent history of neuronal activity contribute to the marked interindividual variability of the suppressive effect of 1 Hz rTMS on corticospinal excitability in healthy subjects (Maeda et al., 2000b).”
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity (2002, positive): “For example, Maeda et al. (2000a, 2000b ) reported a facilitation of MEPs for 2 min after the administration of 240 pulses of 20-Hz stimuli at 90% resting threshold.”
- Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Auditory Verbal Hallucinations as Atypical Inner Speech Monitoring, and the Potential of Neurostimulation as a Treatment Option (neutral): “For example, low frequency (1 Hz) rTMS can have lasting after-effects, which tends to cause a decrease in neuronal activity in the stimulated region, whereas higher frequencies (>5 Hz) can cause lasting excitation (Maeda et al., 2000).”
- Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling (2010, positive): “Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols can be used to transiently modulate cortical excitability of motor areas (Maeda et al., 2000; Mansur et al., 2005; Nowak et al., 2008).”
- The plastic human brain cortex. (2005, background): “…simple movement task can be maintained by rapid operational remapping of motor representations, recruitment of additional motor areas, and task-related changes in cortico-cortical and cortico-muscular coherence (Strens et al. 2002, Chen et al. 2003, Lee et al. 2003, Oliviero et al. 2003).”