A Future Percent-level Measurement of the Hubble Expansion at Redshift 0.8 with Advanced LIGO
By W. Farr, Maya Fishbach, Jiani Ye, D. Holz. Astrophysical Journal, 2019
156 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Simultaneous measurements of distance and redshift can be used to constrain the expansion history of the universe and associated cosmological parameters. Merging binary black hole (BBH) systems are standard sirens—their gravitational waveform provides direct information about the luminosity distance to the source. There is, however, a perfect degeneracy between the source masses and redshift; some nongravitational information is necessary to break the degeneracy and determine the redshift of the source. Here we suggest that the pair instability supernova (PISN) process, thought to be the source of the observed upper limit on the black hole mass in merging BBH systems at , imprints a mass scale in the population of BBH mergers and permits a measurement of the redshift–luminosity–distance relation with these sources. We simulate five years of BBH detections in the Advanced LIGO and Virgo detectors with a realistic BBH merger rate, mass distribution with smooth PISN cutoff, and measurement uncertainty. We show that after one year of operation at design sensitivity the BBH population can constrain H(z) to at a pivot redshift . After five years the constraint improves to . If the PISN cutoff is sharp, the uncertainty is smaller by about a factor of two. This measurement relies only on general relativity and the presence of a mass scale that is approximately fixed or calibrated across cosmic time; it is independent of any distance ladder. Observations by future “third-generation” gravitational wave detectors, which can see BBH mergers throughout the universe, would permit subpercent cosmographical measurements to z ≳ 4 within one month of observation.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9e1512386e62e5833194766f368287d0316379b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
Citations in the corpus
- Constraints from Gravitational-wave Detections of Binary Black Hole Mergers on the 12C(α, γ)16O Rate (2020, methodology): “The existence of a gap in the mass distribution can also be used as a “standardizable siren” for cosmology and used to place constraints on the Hubble constant (Schutz 1986; Holz & Hughes 2005; Farr et al. 2019).”
- Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC–3 (2021, methodology): “…comparing the redshifted mass distribution to an astrophysically-motivated source mass distribution (Chernoff & Finn 1993; Taylor & Gair 2012; Farr et al. 2019; You et al. 2021; Mastrogiovanni et al. 2021), obtaining statistical redshift information from galaxy catalogs (Schutz 1986; MacLeod…”